Castigo por matrimonios falsos para sacar la green card

Es un hecho que se celebran matrimonios falsos con el à ºnico propà ³sito de que el contrayente extranjero obtenga asà ­ la tarjeta de residente permanente (green card) en los Estados Unidos. Pero lo cierto es que la mayorà ­a de las bodas son reales, hechas por amor, aunque mà ¡s tarde la relacià ³n acabe mal. Este artà ­culo trata de por quà © se celebran matrimonios fraudulentos para sacar la green card, cuà ¡les son las estadà ­sticas, cuà ¡l es el castigo si se descubre la mentira y, por à ºltimo, quà © se puede hacer si se descubre que una boda no es de buena fe. Por quà © se dan enlaces fraudulentos para obtener la green card De todas las formas que existen para sacar la green card, la residencia por matrimonio es la mà ¡s comà ºn. Aproximadamente 1 de cada 4 tarjetas de residencia se consiguen de esta manera. La ley permite que tanto los ciudadanos estadounidenses como los residentes permanentes legales puedan pedir los papeles para sus cà ³nyuges, tanto en casos de parejas conformadas por un hombre y una mujer como cuando se trata de parejas gays. En los casos de matrimonio de extranjero con ciudadano se da la mayor incidencia de matrimonios fraudulentos porque ofrece dos grandes ventajas respecto al matrimonio de extranjero con residente: Las peticiones son mà ¡s rà ¡pidasEn algunos casos, pero no en todos, los indocumentados pueden ajustar su estatus y arreglar sus papeles. Esto no sucede nunca en el caso de boda con residente. Los datos sobre matrimonios entre americanos y extranjeros Aunque no hay estadà ­sticas oficiales se estima que en un aà ±o fiscal tà ­pico se pueden presentar aproximadamente 250 mil peticiones de green card por matrimonios entre estadounidenses, por un lado y extranjeros por otro. De ese total de peticiones, aproximadamente en unos 7,000 casos directamente  el USCIS no reconoce tales uniones como matrimonios, por entender que hay  fraude  y, por lo tanto,  ya no se da la tarjeta de residencia permanente al solicitante. En los casos en los que sà ­ se da la green card, se estima que  hasta un 30% de los mismos pueden ser matrimonios fraudulentos. Sin embargo,  se investigan menos y aproximadamente en 7,000 la green card es revocada. Generalmente porque ha habido una  denuncia de matrimonio por negocio o conveniencia, que puede ser anà ³nima. En estos casos, tanto el ICE (institucià ³n encargado de hacer cumplir las leyes migratorias) como el USCIS (servicio de Inmigracià ³n) estudian si realmente investigan el asunto. Castigo si se descubre que un matrimonio es falso En el caso de que se castigue a una persona por matrimonio fraudulento con el fin de obtener o dar los papeles, la condena puede ser de un mà ¡ximo 5 aà ±os de prisià ³n y multa de $250,000. Aunque el castigo se puede aplicar a ambos cà ³nyuges, lo cierto es que el extranjero recibe, en general, una mayor pena: puede ser deportado y, si ya le habà ­an dado la green card cuando se detectà ³ que el matrimonio era de conveniencia, se le quitarà ¡ la residencia. Mientras que en la mayorà ­a de los casos  el ciudadano americano recibirà ¡ sà ³lo un llamado de atencià ³n. Aunque hay excepciones y a veces depende mucho de la jurisdiccià ³n  en la que se  ventila el caso lo mà ¡s comà ºn es que los ciudadanos americanos sean multados e ingresen en prisià ³n por fraude inmigratorio por matrimonio en casos muy excepcionales. Ademà ¡s hay otra importante diferencia en cuanto a las consecuencias. Si un matrimonio entre un ciudadano y un extranjero es fraudulento y se descubre al menos cinco aà ±os mà ¡s tarde, al estadounidense no le pasarà ¡ jamà ¡s nada. Esto es porque el delito prescribe (statue of limitations). Sin embargo en el mismo caso el extranjero serà ¡ privado de su green card y deberà ¡ abandonar los Estados Unidos, asà ­ hayan pasado mà ¡s de cinco aà ±os desde la boda, porque en este caso no hay prescripcià ³n. E incluso en los casos en los que el extranjero pidià ³ la nacionalidad americana por naturalizacià ³n podrà ­a llegar a perder la ciudadanà ­a. Son proceso muy raros de desnaturalizacià ³n, pero son posibles. Quà © se puede hacer si se es và ­ctima de un matrimonio de conveniencia Es comà ºn que en este tipo de bodas falsas los dos contrayentes està ©n de acuerdo, a veces por amistad entre ambos y, a veces, porque se paga una cantidad de dinero. Esto es asà ­ a pesar de que cuando una persona pide los papeles para otra se està ¡ comprometiendo por aà ±os a responder econà ³micamente por ella porque ha firmado el affidavit of support, tambià ©n conocida como declaracià ³n de sostenimiento. Sin embargo, en ocasiones el ciudadano o el residente ni siquiera sospecha de lo que hay no es amor, sino simplemente interà ©s. En estos casos, dependiendo del momento, son posibles diversas situaciones, como por ejemplo:  cancelar la peticià ³n  o incluso solicitar  el divorcio  o, como se seà ±alà ³ mà ¡s arriba en este artà ­culo, denunciando. A tener muy en cuenta El matrimonio de un indocumentado con un ciudadano americano no siempre sirve para regularizar la situacià ³n. Depende, en gran medida, de cà ³mo se ingresà ³ a Estados Unidos. Por à ºltimo, seà ±alar que en ocasiones un matrimonio por amor puede levantar sospechas, por la razà ³n que sea. Estos son 12 documentos que sirven para mostrar que el matrimonio es real. Y estas son 65 preguntas que se pueden formular en la entrevista en el consulado para la visa de inmigrante o en la de ajuste de estatus o para el levantamiento de la condicionalidad de la green card (casos especà ­ficos de matrimonio con ciudadano). Este es un artà ­culo informativo. No es asesorà ­a legal.

Essay Expository on Love - 1251 Words

Love! Not For Everyone Poets and philosophers for centuries have been trying to answer the question, what is love? Love has an infinite number of definitions, which vary from one person to another. Love cannot be measured by any physical means. One may never know what true love is until love it- self has been experienced. What is love? A four letter word that causes a person to behave in a way that is out of character. What is love? A first kiss, childhood crushes on a teacher or friend’s mom. What is love? A choice that people make by putting their partner’s wishes, desires and needs above everything else. What is love? The act of forgiveness, the infatuation with someone, the communication between two people. What is love? A†¦show more content†¦The speaker loves her husband so much that she is willing to meet him no matter what the distance between them might be. Love is the constant care and affection that is needed to flourish and bloom into great beauty. Love is the commitment that two people share. Jarold Ramsey’s poem â€Å"The Tally Stick† is a great example of the commitment that two people share. The speaker says, â€Å"Here from the start, from our first days, look: / I have carved our lives in secret on this stick† (1-2). Starting with their marriage, the first notch is â€Å"Near the butt, this intricate notch where the grains / converge and join: it is our wedding† (6-7). The couple uses the stick as a symbol of their love for each other. The stick symbolizes how committed they are in their relationship. Love is a commitment one makes to put someone’s wishes, desires and needs above all. What if the husband or wife became ill or cannot take care of him or herself anymore? Or perhaps the spouse got orders to go to Iraq, or maybe the spouse got a job offer in another state. What will happen to the life that is shared? Does the spouse give up and move on? No! The spouse’s love and comm itment will keep them together even if they are far away, or moving to another state, or becomes ill. Because love is unconditional, spouses can endure all hardships that cross their path. Love is an infatuation between two people and the desire to be desired. To beShow MoreRelatedI Have A Good Writer949 Words   |  4 Pagesabout the world, statistics, and, perhaps most importantly, myself. I have learned that I love the world and I have statistics. One of the most important things I have learned this year is that I have potential. I have potential to be a good writer. I have always loved writing and reading. Maybe it is because my mother imprinted it upon my brother and myself to read a lot. Perhaps it is because I truly love the smell and feel of books, or the release you get from writing out what you have been keepingRead MoreEssay on Ausubel’s Expository Teaching Model1394 Words   |  6 PagesAusubel’s Expository Teaching Model Highly abstract concepts, such as jurisprudence and sovereignty, oftentimes cause high school students much struggle when trying to thoroughly understand such conceptual ideas. To teach these theoretical concepts, one must not only equivalently utilize David Ausubel’s Expository teaching model, but also retain an overall knowledge of other valuable strategies related to Ausubels’s model (Woolfolk, 2004, p. 281). To Ausubel, the most significant idea is thatRead MoreExpository Teaching1408 Words   |  6 Pages such as jurisprudence and sovereignty, oftentimes cause high school students much struggle when trying to thoroughly understand such conceptual ideas. To teach these theoretical concepts, one must not only equivalently utilize David Ausubels Expository teaching model, but also retain an overall knowledge of other valuable strategies related to Ausubelss model (Woolfolk, 2004, p. 281). To Ausubel, the most significant idea is that of the advance organizer, a st atement of introduction that aidsRead MoreEssay on Broken Lives663 Words   |  3 Pages Broken Lives written by Estelle Blackburn is an expository text, which through research has presented that nineteen year old John Button was wrongfully convicted of killing his seventeen year old girlfriend Rosemary Anderson in a hit and run. I believe through my reading of Broken Lives that the key factor of expository texts is to explore awkward questions deeply and critically. In this case who was guilty of killing Rosemary Anderson in a hit and run, John Button or Eric Edgar Cooke, and the effectRead MoreThe Pros and Cons of Student Preaching1379 Words   |  6 Pagesmain factor is we must learn to understand the basic principles of Expository, Topical and Textual preaching. It will serve as a safety net for any student preacher to follow. This safety net will help them become fisher of men to reach their congregation, the lost and the world as well as to become builders in the Kingdom of God. The Difference between Expository, Topical and Textual Preaching The difference between Expository, Topical and Textual preaching is very easy to understand once you seeRead MoreHow Personal Responsibility Will Lead to My Success Essay1089 Words   |  5 Pagesartistic freedom (the goal of which is to paint an image that is vivid and moving in the mind of the reader).† (para. 1). I believe the goals of this essay lend themselves better to a descriptive essay than they do an expository essay. According to The Expository Essay (2011), The expository essay is a genre of essay that requires the student to investigate an idea, evaluate evidence, expound on the idea, and set forth an argument concerning that idea in a clear and concise manner. This can be accomplishedRead MoreComputer Effects on the Academic Performance of Students - Review of Related Literature806 Words   |  4 PagesLOVE,SEX AND LASTING RELATIONSHIP AN EXPOSITORY WRITING Presented to : MS.ROVI NOFEL C. ABLIN Faculty, Department of Social Sciences and Humanities College of Education and Social Sciences Mindanao State University at Naawan 903 Naawan, Misamis Orriental In Partial fulfillment Of the requirements for the course English 2 (Writing in Discipline) 2nd semester A.Y 2012-2013 By: JANINE DUAT MAGDALERA March 1,2013 Love and Infatuation I love you is a very common phrase usedRead MoreMember of the Wedding by Carson Mccullers - Context Essay (Expository)1748 Words   |  7 Pagesothers shape who we are. These connections ideally provide love, protection, security and the opportunity to discover our values, attitudes, and beliefs that help to define us from the time of our birth. In ‘The Member of the Wedding’, although Frankie is accepted by her younger cousin John Henry and housemaid Berenice, she lacks proper familial bonds, with her mother having passed away when she was little, and her father not giving her the love and attention that she requires. This absence of a strongRead MoreGraduation Speech - Original Writing893 Words   |  4 Pagesseason. I cleverly titled my narrative â€Å"Wanderlust†, meaning a strong desire to travel. The expository paper was basically a book report, but it was also enjoyable. I’m glad I chose to read Pride and Prejudice because I don’t think I would have ever read it on my own time and it was a good book. My expository essay summarized the book and then went on to discuss the most prominent themes is the story: gender, love, and pride. Unfortunately I did dwindle on my focus and dedication towards the end of theRead MoreThe Freedom Writers And Romeo And Juliet905 Words   |  4 Pagesdue to my junior year. I had English 12 and Expository Reading and Writing Course. English 12 was an easy laid back class were we only had 3 essays during the whole year. We read books like Frankenstein and Hamlet, but did not do essays about. We mostly read as a class and did short easy activities related to the readings. She was not a tough grader so with some effort put into the essays I would get high grades on my essays. On the other hand Expository Reading and Writing Course was an intense were

Why Evolution and Religion Can Coexist Free Essays

Jason Soares 1-1 Science and Religion Can Coexist – Revision 2 For centuries science and religion have been competing with each other to reign supreme over the other. It makes one wonder just why it has come to this. After all aren’t they in many aspects quite similar? Consider the following; the theory of evolution, the big bang theory, and the Copenhagen interpretation theory all have one constant term, â€Å"theory†. We will write a custom essay sample on Why Evolution and Religion Can Coexist or any similar topic only for you Order Now Why? – All of them haven’t been proven yet as they are still mere theories. Now shifting over to religion, when reading a holy book, one finds no facts or substantial evidence of how things exist as they do today. Religion, as much of science, is merely based on beliefs. Yet billions choose to either believe in a higher being or eliminate the idea of a god altogether. No matter which side is true or false, one true statement that can be made is that one could not exist without the other. Religion is for spiritual healing and belief; whereas, science is, in most cases, the actual embodiment of our beliefs. Science and religion can coexist because; arguably the greatest mind of them all said so, religion’s morals and values uses science to the benefit of all mankind, and perhaps God himself used science to create all that we see. Firstly, if indisputably the greatest scientist in the history of mankind, Albert Einstein – the person who set the base for modern science as we know it today – found no problem in believing in both science and religion, then why should we? Einstein did not believe in a personal God, a god who cares for us or intervenes in the lives of people, but in one that maintained and created the harmony of the universe; a god nonetheless. That may seem quite odd as many beliefs render science and religion incompatible. Yet, many scientists, according to surveys, say that there is no conflict between their faith and their work. Joel Primack, a professor from the University of California, Santa Cruz, co-developed the cold dark matter theory that seeks to explain the formation and structure of the universe. He also believes in God and that God and science can exist in harmony. He claims that â€Å"in the last few years astronomy has come together so that we’re now able to tell a coherent story† of how the universe began, Primack said. â€Å"This story does not contradict God, but instead enlarges [the idea of] God. † (National Geographic News website) This is one example of how clearly science and religion go hand in hand. Secondly, most religions in this world teach three basic steps in being able to enter the â€Å"eternal life† that most of them offer: respect one another, love your neighbour and be kind to all. Not a bad list on which to base a whole religion on. In fact it sounds quite noble. Think about it, many lives are based on the above list due to a strict enforcing of religion from family or a community, and if even a small portion of those people grow up to be doctors and scientists, we can say with ease that the future of our technological advancements is bright and it is in the right hands. After analyzing the upbringing of these theoretical people, we can come to a conclusion that religion helped a great deal in steering their science-filled future in the right direction. It will be foolish on our part to deny religion just because we’ve advanced in science and technology. As our knowledge increases, we must move nearer to the roots of our religion, and this is the stage when both religion and science will be working together for the betterment of mankind. For example, euthanasia, the killing of a human being to relieve pain and suffering (mercy-killing), is widely considered unethical. This mercy-killing is just a euphemism for suicide. The reason why we don’t say suicide is because it is usually frowned upon by society, yet when someone is on a hospital bed and doesn’t want to live anymore, it’s justified. People say suicide and mercy-killing are different, but they both lead to the same result: the killing of a human being because the person no longer has a desire to live. By definition, this is indeed suicide because it is taking a life away since they no longer find value for it, and yet it is being done throughout the world in public hospitals. Now a doctor with a good moral and ethical background due to religion or a community with strong values would not succumb to the pressures of this daily occurrence. And aren’t doctors supposed to bring life into this world and help sustain it when outside forces threaten it? Moreover, it is daunting to think that someone can just â€Å"pull the plug† on another being just because the former wants to die. Science and technology can be a blessing in the hands of wise men, while it can be deadly in the hands of others, and if we are wiser and nearer to our religious roots we can enjoy our lives better knowing that religion’s morals and values will use science to the benefit of all mankind. Thirdly, possibly one of the most controversial and heated theories of all is the one that concerns the very place in which we live in, the big bang theory. According to the big bang theory, space, time, and all matter around us was created by the grandest explosion ever to occur in our universe. When consulting religious persons about this theory they would whole heartedly disagree with it. Assuming they were Catholics, they would immediately refer to the Bible and cite that God created the world, the vegetation, animals, and humans within it. Now level headed persons who are on neither side of the science-religion debate would argue that, why can’t both the big bang theory and the biblical story of God be true? They would reason that perhaps God used this method of creation for His own purpose, to create a world that is habitable by life. Once again the religious would disagree, saying that according to the book of Genesis, God created Earth in seven days, and according to the big bang theory the earth took billions of years to develop in order to exhibit any traces of human life. Seven days compared to billions of years is quite a difference, yet when examining the word of God in the Bible, the religious cannot take the seven day period so literally. Perhaps it did take God seven days to create the earth, but maybe God was on a different time scale. One day for us is twenty four hours, but one day for God could have been thousands, millions, or billions of years. Furthermore, perhaps these seven days weren’t consecutive. They could have been spanned out over billions of years and just the major days on which God created his most praised wonders are mentioned. In addition to the creation process of the earth, God could have used the scientific methods of photosynthesis, natural selection, and countless others to create this world. Not only can we bring science and religion closer together than ever by this new perspective, but we can say that one definitely assisted in the process of the other and that the relationship between science and religion is strong. Ultimately, one can see that science and religion can coexist, because; many of our brightest minds are an example of this, science can be used for worthy causes due to religion’s ethics, and with a new perspective it can be debated that God himself used science for his own creation purposes. No one is forced to sway either way of the debate and everyone is elcomed to stay neutral, nonetheless, one cannot obliviously deny one and praise the other with an un-open mind. We can choose to believe one, but we shouldn’t reject the other altogether. All we should ask of ourselves is not to ignore the pressing questions which alter our views on religion or science, but to expand our tunnel vision and wander into unfamiliar territories to grasp a bett er understanding of both; consequently closing the gap between science and religion so that one day the feud between the two may rest peacefully in the minds of all. How to cite Why Evolution and Religion Can Coexist, Papers

Regaining Confidence Coca Cola Samples for Students †MyAssignmenthelp

Question: Discuss about the Regaining Confidence Coca Cola. Answer: Introduction It was the year 1886 when Coca-Cola was invented by John Pemberton, a Pharmacist in Atlanta, Georgia. He sold the drink with fountain water in it as a medicine for mental and physical disorders. (World of Coca-Cola, 2017) After that Asa D. Candler added carbonation to it and by the year 2003, Coca-Cola became the worlds biggest manufacturer, distributor, and marketer of non-alcoholic beverages with 400 worldwide known brands under it. On 5th August 2003, an activist association of India, The Centre for Science and Environment (CSE), specially focusing on the consequences of industrialization and economic growth towards environment issued a press release disclosing 12 major cold drink brands sold in and around Delhi contain a deadly cocktail of pesticide residues. (The Economic Times, 2003) The tests were organised by the Pollution Monitoring Laboratory (PML) of CSE between April to August. The 3 samples out of 12 Coca-Cola brands from Delhi were found to carry residues of pesticides 30-36 times more than that of global standards. The pesticides constituted were lindane, DDT, malathion and chlorpyrifos and they were known to be the causes of cancer, nervous system damage, birth defects, reproductive system damage, and major problems of the immune system. (Coca-Cola India, 2005) Reacting to this, the Government of India banned Coca-Cola commodities in the country. Both central and state governments started investigating the case. Coca-Cola quoted the CSE claims as baseless and doubted the methods of testing. To this CSE replied that all the definitive procedures described by US EPA (Environmental Protection Agency) were followed. The tests also included Gas Chromatography and Mass Spectrometry. The whole controversy affected financially as sales dropped by 30-40 percent in just two weeks and 11 percent in third quarter. (Business-standard.com, 2003) Many potential clubs, retailers, college campuses and restaurants stopped selling Coca-Cola at their places. The consumers said that they believe in CSE findings and accord with the decision to ban the soft drinks. (Coca-Cola India, 2005) The management was quite clear that this allegation is to harm the image of the company and if it continues, the company will take legal action. The company arranged press conferences, where it questioned the credibility of CSE and told that the products are regularly tested at independent laboratories and this data will be uploaded to their website. A lot of advertisements in daily newspapers were launched stating the beverage is safe to drink. (Washingtonpost.com, 2006) Further, the Delhi High Court questioned the government to make a committee and revise the standards with inclusion of pesticide norms. The three stakeholder groups are public, Health Ministry of India and employees. The motivation to employees will be provided by a presentation where they will be told the truth that no pesticides are in drinks. A report will be sent to Health Ministry regarding the truth and the public will be addressed by a press release in daily newspaper. The aim of this media strategy is to reveal the truth. The press release covers a large audience who are buyers and responsible for increase or decrease in sales. A report is sent to the Health Ministry to take necessary steps. The best way to motivate employees is through presentation. This strategy will rebuild the confidence of stakeholders and ultimately benefit company. Report to Health Ministry There was a ban implied on our products by Government after considering the test result reports from CSE (Centre for Science and Environment), an activist group. We believe that the decision to ban our products was a bit fast because the Government reacted based on report only. We were not even asked to provide the test results that independent laboratories used to conduct for us on a regular basis. This is to inform you that we do not believe the reports provided by CSE because the tests were conducted by their own laboratory PML (Pollution Monitoring Laboratory). Here we clearly question the credibility of CSE. If the tests were to be done, they should have been conducted at independent laboratories. Kindly note that the most essential component of our business is maintaining the quality benchmarks. We cant uphold while deceiving and unaccredited information is utilized to ruin our trusted world class brand. Recent allegations have brought unneeded anxiety among Indian consumers. If it is not, cross checked, then it would damage our business in India and influence the livelihood of our huge number of employees all over the nation. The company wants to clear that the tests are also conducted by us and that too in independent world class laboratories following all the necessary standards. The results showed no such increased levels of pesticides in our beverages. All the test result reports are available on our website so that anyone can check them. The website also provides the information about the ongoing issues and there are some facts that clarifies that why our beverage brands should be trusted. All our products are safe and hygienic and can be used without any doubts. Before the production starts, testing is done and when the test results are acceptable, then only production starts. The health and hygiene of our consumers is the centre of our business. So, the instructions are quite clear at any of our plant and we have uniform global standards that are followed equally at each production unit in the world. It is not at all the case that different norms are for different countries. We again request you to interfere in this matter and bring the truth out to the people of country. Also, provide us the necessary improvised guidelines so that we can restart the plants. In this way, consumers can again enjoy drinking Coca-Cola and the lives of our employees can come on track. For any type of clarification regarding this issue or any other, the management of the company will always be there. We will keep you updated with every step we will take resolve this issue. Press Release to Daily Newspaper Coca-Cola India Floor 16, One Horizon Center, Sector 43, Gurugram, Haryana 122016 India Tel: +91 85120 97817 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE Date. [Name of the Manager] Communications Manager e-mail: abc@xyz.com Coca-Cola: Always Safe Coca-Cola wants to assure the consumers of India that your Coca-Cola is safe to drink. There were reports by an activist firm about increased residues of pesticides in our beverages. We completely deny the allegations. Recently, there was a news alleging us about the quality measures of our beverages in India. The activist organization conducted some tests in its subsidiary laboratory and spread the news of pesticides in our beverages. We consider these charges critical. The company wants to guarantee you that our products in India are as safe as in any other part of the world. The most essential component of our business is maintaining the quality benchmarks. We cannot uphold while deceiving and unaccredited information is utilized to ruin our trusted world class brand. Recent allegations have brought unneeded anxiety amongst you all. If it is not, cross checked, then it would damage our business in India and impact the livelihood of our huge number of employees all through the nation. This is just to deteriorate our image in the market. The Health ministry is also notified about this issue. A request is placed with Ministry of Health to interfere in this matter, remove the ban from our products and bring the truth out to the people of India. We also deny the tests because they were conducted in the laboratory that is subsidiary of this activist organization. These allegations are very serious and the company conducted fresh tests at independent laboratories. The results are made available on our website where anybody can access them and recognize the truth. Some, myths that are making rumours in the market are also clarified on the website. All doubts will be cleared if you read the information available on the companys website. The company wants to reassure that there are no elevated levels of pesticides in any of the beverages of our brand. We regularly test our products and when the results are satisfactory, then only production starts. The health and hygiene of consumers is the core of our business. No compromise was ever done and will never be done towards the health of the consumers. We know that we cannot survive in the market if our products will harm the consumers. The company will take legal action against the activist for deteriorating the image of Coca-Cola. For more information, the management from the company will always be there. As long as there's a need, regardless of how substantial or little, we will answer the call for help in every way possible. Coca-Cola India, is the Indian subsidiary of The Coca-Cola Company, USA. Coca-Cola re-entered the Indian market in 1993 and constantly growing each year with 27 wholly-owned bottling operations supplemented by 29 franchisee bottling operations and 29 contract packers. Coca-Cola is ranked #1 brand globally according to Interbrands Global Brand Scorecard. References Business-standard.com. (2003). Coke sales fall 11% on pesticide controversy. [online] Available at: https://www.business-standard.com/article/companies/coke-sales-fall-11-on-pesticide-controversy-103102901064_1.html [Accessed 23 May 2017]. Coca-Cola India. (2005). 1st ed. [ebook] Dartmouth: Tuck School of Business. Available at: https://www.google.co.in/url?sa=trct=jq=esrc=ssource=webcd=1cad=rjauact=8ved=0ahUKEwjmzL3Tk4jUAhWMRY8KHfPnAE0QFggjMAAurl=http%3A%2F%2Fmba.tuck.dartmouth.edu%2Fpdf%2F2004-1-0085.pdfusg=AFQjCNF5jJ41yYbfuWEN4MeJdmpGY7cbWAsig2=GhMoSEz8MTrWJ6YApL0c-Q [Accessed 23 May 2017]. Coca-Cola India. (2017). Coca-Cola India. [online] Available at: https://www.coca-colaindia.com/ [Accessed 23 May 2017]. India, M. (2017). Department of Health and Family Welfare: Ministry of Health Family Welfare. [online] Mohfw.gov.in. Available at: https://mohfw.gov.in/index1.php?lang=1level=1sublinkid=5691lid=3609 [Accessed 23 May 2017]. The Economic Times. (2003). Pesticide controversy takes toll on Pepsi, Coca-Cola - The Economic Times. [online] Available at: https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/saal-the-year/pesticide-controversy-takes-toll-on-pepsi-coca-cola/articleshow/381859.cms [Accessed 23 May 2017]. Washingtonpost.com. (2006). Coke Responds to India Pesticide Charges. [online] Available at: https://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/08/08/AR2006080800694.html [Accessed 23 May 2017]. World of Coca-Cola. (2017). Coca-Cola History ? World of Coca-Cola. [online] Available at: https://www.worldofcoca-cola.com/about-us/coca-cola-history/ [Accessed 23 May 2017].